“CTA’s experienced subject matter experts
reduced and eliminated our program risks.”


If you don’t define and manage what you’re going to change, how do you know if the change has been successful?

The primary objective of Configuration Management (CM) is to maintain the integrity of products throughout the project life cycle. CTA’s developers are experts at large enterprise development; they have the maturity and experience to address not only the project itself, but how the change affects the entire enterprise.

CM is defined as a process of identifying a standard set of criteria or a baseline, facilitating organized controlled change to that baseline, and monitoring that baseline for both authorized and unauthorized change. CM processes play a key role in the management of individual products and the entire enterprise. Effective use of a documented and repeatable configuration management process helps to ensure successful achievement of program goals.

CTA has adopted a CM methodology that addresses the requirements of a large enterprise.  In a large enterprise CM must be implemented in a hierarchical manner.  Each level has a span of authority which yields a balance of control over all levels of CM in the entire enterprise.  Those change requests that affect elements over which a Configuration Control Board (CCB) at a certain level is not authorized, are relegated to the next level to adjudicate.  The results of this pass up are returned to the original CCB for final implementation. CTA’s proven methodology has been successful with multiple clients and multiple large scale contracts. 

Each CM element is addressed by CTA in a tailored manner, dependent upon the requirements of the particular client or contract. CM consists of the following elements:

  • Identification
  • Change Control
  • Configuration Audits
  • Status Accounting

Experience

For a Health Affairs-Information Management client, CTA developed a formal process for change control of functional requirements changes.

CTA’s disciplined solution resulted in saving money, time and aggravation, and minimizing duplicate activities. Additionally, requirements will be properly managed so that they do not have to be re-invented.

CTA’s unique solution involved a system of base-lining current requirements at prescribed events. Only certain authorities had change control depending upon the position of the event/activity in the life cycle.